September 16, 2014 — A large, international analysis of patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) indicates that a patient’s overall survival (OS) rate can be related to factors including the timing of when metastases develop and lymph node involvement, and that aggressive treatment for “low-risk” patients leads to a five-year OS rate of 47.8 percent. The research was presented today at the 56th annual meeting of the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO).

When lung cancer has metastasized, the goal of treatment is to slow the cancer down with chemotherapy or radiation, but these treatments are unable to eradicate the cancer and survival is usually in the range of only a few months. However, when there are only a few locations of metastatic lung cancer (called oligo-metastatic), some studies suggest that by removing or eradicating each of those cancer deposits with aggressive treatments such as surgery or high-dose, precise radiation called stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR), the cancer may be controlled for a long period of time. 

In order to further study the possible benefits of aggressive treatments in stage IV lung cancer, researchers completed this meta-analysis, which evaluated data of 757 stage IV NSCLC patients from 20 hospitals worldwide who had between one and five metastatic deposits that were removed surgically or eradicated with high-dose, precise radiotherapy. Patients in the study also had to have had aggressive treatment of their original lung tumor. The intent of the study was to determine whether long-term survivors exist after aggressive treatment of oligo-metastases, and to propose a risk classification scheme that could be used to identify which stage IV patients are most likely to benefit from aggressive treatments.

The analysis determined the factors that impacted overall survival of the patients included the timing of when the metastases appeared—that is, whether the metastases appeared at the same time as the original lung cancer (synchronous) versus if they appeared after the original lung cancer (metachronous)—whether lymph nodes in the chest were involved (N-stage), and the type of lung cancer (adenocarcinoma versus other types).

Using these factors, the study identified three risk groups of patients: 1) low-risk patients (146), or patients who survived the longest, were those with metachronous metastases, with a five-year OS of 47.8 percent; 2) intermediate-risk patients (201), those with synchronous metastases and no evidence of involved lymph nodes in the chest, with a five-year OS of 36.2 percent; and 3) high-risk patients (184), patients with the poorest survival, were those who had synchronous metastases and evidence of lymph node involvement in the chest; they had a five-year OS of 13.8 percent.

Furthermore, the study found that despite receiving aggressive treatments, more than half of the patients progressed in previously treated areas or developed new sites of disease within one year of treatment.

“Our study finds some stage IV NSCLC patients can achieve long-term survival after aggressive treatments; however, it is important to note that the patients in this study are a very select minority of stage IV patients who are younger, more physically fit, with a lower burden and slower pace of disease than the average stage IV patient,” said lead study author Allison Ashworth, M.D., a radiation oncologist who completed the study as part of her training at the London Health Sciences Centre at Western University in London, Ontario. “We hope our study’s results will help determine which stage IV NSCLC patients are most likely to benefit from aggressive treatments, and equally as important, help identify those patients most likely to fail, thus sparing them from futile and potentially harmful treatments. Our research, however, cannot answer the question of whether the longer survival is due to the treatments or simply because these patients have less aggressive disease. We must await the results of randomized clinical trials to answer this question. In the meantime, it is our hope that our study will help cancer specialists in making treatment decisions and in the development of clinical trials.”

For more information: www.astro.org


Related Content

News | Artificial Intelligence

Sept. 13, 2024 — Bayer Calantic Digital Solutions has announced the availability of a new eBook that addresses how ...

Time September 12, 2024
arrow
News

Aug. 5, 2024 — Researchers from The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center have demonstrated that adding ...

Time August 09, 2024
arrow
News | PET-CT

July 31, 2024 — In a head-to-head comparison with FDG PET/CT, FDG PET/MRI demonstrated comparable or superior diagnostic ...

Time July 31, 2024
arrow
Feature | Radiation Oncology | By Christine Book

News emerging from several leading organizations and vendors in the radiation therapy arena came in at a fast pace in ...

Time July 30, 2024
arrow
News | Artificial Intelligence

July 22, 2024 — Healthcare artificial intelligence (AI) systems provider, Qure.ai, has announced its receipt of a Class ...

Time July 22, 2024
arrow
News | Radiation Oncology

July 11, 2024 — The American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) issued the following statement from Jeff M ...

Time July 11, 2024
arrow
News | Radiation Oncology

July 9, 2024 — Insights from the latest Mordor Intelligence report, “Radiotherapy Market Size & Share Analysis - Growth ...

Time July 09, 2024
arrow
News | Prostate Cancer

July 5, 2024 — Lantheus Holdings, Inc., a leading radiopharmaceutical-focused company committed to enabling clinicians ...

Time July 05, 2024
arrow
News | Radiology Business

July 3, 2024 — The American Society of Radiologic Technologists has launched the BeRAD Professionalism Award to ...

Time July 03, 2024
arrow
News | Radiation Therapy

July 3, 2024 — Results from a new study led by researchers at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center support ...

Time July 03, 2024
arrow
Subscribe Now