Sean Reilly is healthcare brands group publisher (Imaging Technology News and Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiology) at Scranton Gillette Communications.

Blog | January 29, 2015

Where Have All the Cowboys Gone? ITN Publisher Responds to Consumer Reports Article on CT Scanning

The silence is deafening. And since radiology associations, physician groups and vendors have yet to publicly respond to the elephant in the room, I offer the following in hopes we can get the conversation started...

On Tuesday, January 27, Consumer Reports (CR) posted an article and video that, in a not entirely subtle way, accused physicians and the radiology community of ignorance, negligence and/or malfeasance. The gist of CR’s article is that many physicians are sending patients for CT Scans they don’t really need, either to cover a specific part of their anatomy from lawsuits or to pay the mortgages on their pricey CT scanners. And the cherry on top is approximately 15,000 patients receiving CT scans will die from being exposed to high doses of cancer-causing radiation.

Haven’t we danced this dance before?!

The CR piece was, in the very least, irresponsible – igniting yet another media firestorm that will, no doubt, result in unnecessary and unwarranted consumer panic. CR didn’t appear to interview representatives from leading radiology associations, radiology groups or – God forbid – technology vendors for their perspectives on this subject. More disturbing perhaps, one would think the mainstream media would do its homework before parroting Consumer Reports-speak. Not the case. “If it bleeds, it leads baby!”

Nowhere in the article was mention of the number of lives saved by CT scans annually. Nowhere in the article was mention of training programs offered by educational groups, associations, healthcare media, and technology vendors. Nowhere in the article was mention of how said vendors are committing considerable resources to develop transformational dose-lowering technology and dose monitoring software/programs. Might mention of this steal the thunder of CR’s article or subsequent media coverage?

In fairness to Consumer Reports and to healthcare consumers, yes, there have been abuses. Yes, some CT scans have been prescribed for less than altruistic reasons. Yes, more needs to be done to educate healthcare providers about the dangers of radiation dose. Yes, radiation dose is a valid concern that healthcare consumers need to be aware of and discuss with their care providers. My issue is with how this was communicated by both CR and the mainstream media. If you’re going to “educate” – then educate. Don’t sensationalize. Call me loco, but shouldn’t the responsibility of educating healthcare consumers about radiation dose be the responsibility of healthcare professionals, rather than consumer media, who apparently still have much to learn?

Cowboys, let your collective voices be heard.

Radiation Dose Articles and Resources from Imaging Technology News and ITNonline.com

CT Dose: The Need For Management

Comparison Chart: CT Dose Management

Recording and Managing Radiation Dose

Comparison Chart: Radiation Dose Management

White Paper: Utilization of a Dose Management Solution to Lower Radiation in Medical Imaging

White Paper: GE Healthcare's DoseWatch

White Paper: GE Healthcare: Delivering the Right Dose

White Paper: Visualize Your Way to Safer Imaging

Strategies for Low-Dose MDCT

Webinar: Contemporary Adult Cardiac Interventions and Their Associated Radiation Exposure: Managing Dose in an Increasingly Complex Environment